The Elgar Companion to Public Choice, Second Edition
Show Less

The Elgar Companion to Public Choice, Second Edition

Edited by William F. Shughart II, Laura Razzolini and Michael Reksulak

The Companion lays out a comprehensive history of the field and, in five additional parts, it explores public choice contributions to the study of the origins of the state, the organization of political activity, the analysis of decision-making in non-market institutions, the examination of tribal governance and to modeling and predicting the behavior of international organizations and transnational terrorism.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 2: Public choice: the origins and development of a research program

Charles K. Rowley


Public choice is a relatively new discipline located at the interface between economics and political science. Its modern founding was the achievement of Duncan Black (1948a, 1948b, 1948c) whose articles are widely viewed as the seminal contributions that launched scholarship in the application of economic analysis into the traditional domain of political science. Yet, its true founding goes back almost two centuries in time, to the late eighteenth-century contributions of two French encyclopedistes, the Compte de Borda and the Marquis de Condorcet. The two French noblemen shared a conviction that social sciences were amenable to mathematical rigor, and made significant contributions to the theory of voting. These contributions form the foundations on which much of modern public choice has been built. In his pioneering work on elections, Condorcet sought to ‘inquire by mere reasoning, what degree of confidence the judgment of assemblies deserves’ (1785, p. iv). In modern jargon, he posed what is now known as the jury problem or the vote problem. The starting point, well-known to the encyclopedistes, is that majority voting is unambiguously the best voting rule only when two candidates are on stage. How might this rule be extended to three or more candidates? The naive but widely held answer is plurality voting, where each voter casts a vote for one candidate and the candidate with most votes is elected.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.