Integrating Economic and Organization Theory
Edited by Anna Grandori
Chapter 6: The enterprise as community: firms, towns, and universities
At a very broad level, firms and municipalities share a number of features. Among other things, both are self-governing entities that make investments and purchase, produce, and distribute goods and services, sometimes, but not always, for an explicit price. Yet towns and firms are perceived as being governed differently: Whereas municipalities are governed democratically, the archetypal firm is viewed as an autocracy. The sharp contrast conventionally drawn between ‘autocratic’ firms and more ‘democratic’ entities like towns and cooperatives is misleading, however. As Henry Hansmann (1988) has pointed out, traditional business corporations are, in essence, lender cooperatives, organizations over which investors exercise democratic control. From this perspective, the issue becomes less one of whether communities or enterprises are democratically governed but who gets to vote. This chapter explores the role and limitations of democratic governance and the factors that contribute to the dominant forms of governance observed in political and commercial settings. Following an overview of the functions of democracy, I discuss some of the distinctive and common features of town and firms. I then present evidence on the extent of faculty participation in decision making in American (United States) colleges and universities and discuss the origins and possible reasons for the existence of and observed variations in democratic governance in academic institutions. I conclude that a primary function of democratic governance is protecting the interests of parties for whom markets and contracts are least effective and discuss the implications of this function for the governance of business enterprises.
You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.