Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Second Edition
Show Less

Elgar Encyclopedia of Comparative Law, Second Edition

Edited by Jan M. Smits

Written by leading authorities in their respective fields, the contributions in this accessible book cover and combine not only questions regarding the methodology of comparative law, but also specific areas of law (such as administrative law and criminal law) and specific topics (such as accident compensation and consideration). In addition, the Encyclopedia contains reports on a selected set of countries’ legal systems and, as a whole, presents an overview of the current state of affairs.
Buy Book in Print
Show Summary Details
You do not have access to this content

Chapter 11: China

Junwei Fu


With the rapid development of the economy over the past few decades, the legal system of the People’s Republic of China is receiving ever more interest from the West. The study of Chinese law poses special challenges for those educated in the Western world. In fact, the concept of law as we know it today is difficult to place in the Chinese legal tradition. In China’s thousands years of history, the notion of law has been frequently associated with the ideology of punishment, which only referred to the criminal law. The development of modern Chinese law started in the early 20th century, the purpose of which was to maintain the rule of the Qing Dynasty because it was believed that reform of the legal system could lead to China becoming a more influential country. The reform of the traditional legal system was largely based on the models of German law and Japanese law. From that time onwards, China was mostly influenced by the example of the European continental legal system. However, it has to be noted that although the legal system in mainland China is uniform, Hong Kong and Macao have a different legal system. In Hong Kong, the common law system is still in place, while Macao implemented a legal system based on the Portuguese model. In mainland China only the People’s Congress and its Standing Committee can make national law, while each province or autonomous region can make local statutes (in so far as this is not contrary to the law).

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.

Further information

or login to access all content.