Thirty five years seems a long time to proceed from frustrated question to tentative response, but when we look at all that has been accomplished it has really been the blink of an eye. In that time popular ‘electronic games’ have evolved from the simple game of Pong to the endless universe of No Man's Sky, with a myriad of breakthroughs, detours, and misadventures in between. One consistent theme has been emergent throughout – video games as proof that we humans could evolve from passive viewers of media to the interactive controller/creator of today's virtual worlds. The accompanying technological evolution involved many innovations representing the bricks and mortar of that all-consuming digital landscape including consumer-scale implementations ranging from the practical (Controllers; Micro-transactions; On-line ‘communities’; Portable handheld video devices; Voice Over IP) to the fanciful (Avatars; Augmented Reality; Digital 3D; ‘Open Worlds’; Virtual Reality). In turn, each innovation was an exponential complication, not only to the developers and engineers, but also unsurprisingly to the lawyers plying their profession among the myriad contracts, licenses, clearances and IP strategies that are the business foundation for each game creation. As the video-game industry grew to be arguably the largest and most profitable entertainment medium, so inevitably did the involvement of the legal bar, the complexity of issues, and the cases and decisions spawned.
Equally strange is our general addiction to games, both physical and mental. The profusion of games is truly startling: card games, board games, word games, ball games, electronic games …. We even assemble in huge crowds to watch others playing games. What does all this mean? Do we simply get easily bored and cannot tolerate inactivity? I can find nothing in the literature of scientific psychology that helps me to understand such bizarre behavior.
And so, a tripartite parallel evolution can be observed from a distance:
the evolution of interactive entertainment;
interactive entertainment as a potential force in human evolution;
evolving legal consequences to be explored.
This journal is also rooted deeply and deeply inspired by the Centre for Commercial Law Studies, Queen Mary University of London which represents a common point of biographical intersection among the three Co-Editor-In-Chiefs. Its people served as an incubator and platform for our ideas. Special thanks go to its Director, Professor Spyros Maniatis for his enthusiasm and support from the outset. Finally, we would like to give our special thanks to our publishers at Edward Elgar, in particular Luke Adams, Ben Booth, and also John-Paul McDonald, for making our vision come to life.
We hope you enjoy and are challenged by the pages that follow. May we continue to evolve together.
Mary Meeker's 2017 internet trends report: All the slides, plus analysis: https://www.recode.net/2017/5/31/15693686/mary-meeker-kleiner-perkins-kpcb-slides-internet-trends-code-2017.
By the psychologist Leon Festinger in the Introduction to his final book The Human Legacy (Columbia University Press, 1983), p. x.