Show Summary Details

China's problematic recognition of a right of priority based on an application filed in Taiwan

Ping-Hsun Chen

Keywords: TRIPS Agreement; right of priority; Paris Convention; Taiwan; China

Abstract

Before China entered into the ‘Cross-Strait Agreement on Intellectual Property Rights Cooperation and Protection’ with Taiwan, China did not recognize a right of priority based on a Taiwan application. Under Article 2 of the Cross-Strait IP Agreement, China agreed to permit Taiwanese applicants to claim priority based on their Taiwan applications. China has issued three regulations to comply with Article 2. However, by doing so, China violates Article 2.1 of the TRIPS Agreement because a Taiwan application is a legitimate foreign application under Article 4 of the Paris Convention and, therefore, non-Taiwanese applicants may claim priority based on a Taiwan application. China also violates the doctrine of ‘Most-Favoured-Nation (MFN) Treatment’ under Article 4 of the TRIPS Agreement because the grant of priority based on a Taiwan application is only applicable to Taiwanese applicants, which discriminates against non-Taiwanese applicants of any WTO member states other than Taiwan.

You are not authenticated to view the full text of this chapter or article.

Elgaronline requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books or journals. Please login through your library system or with your personal username and password on the homepage.

Non-subscribers can freely search the site, view abstracts/ extracts and download selected front matter and introductory chapters for personal use.

Your library may not have purchased all subject areas. If you are authenticated and think you should have access to this title, please contact your librarian.


Further information

or login to access all content.